Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wilkins v. Chardo, 1:18-CV-727. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20181105h20 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2018, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 4) to remand filed by plaintiff Glue Wilkins ("Wilkins") and the motion (Doc. 3) to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Dauphin County District Attorney Francis T. Chardo, III ("DA Chardo"), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Wilkins' motion (Doc. 4)
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2018, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 4) to remand filed by plaintiff Glue Wilkins ("Wilkins") and the motion (Doc. 3) to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Dauphin County District Attorney Francis T. Chardo, III ("DA Chardo"), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Wilkins' motion (Doc. 4) to remand is DENIED. 2. DA Chardo's motion (Doc. 3) to dismiss is GRANTED. All claims in the amended complaint (Doc. 1-42) are DISMISSED. Leave to amend is denied. 3. Wilkins' remaining miscellaneous motions (Docs. 12-17, 22-23, 26-27, 32-34) are DISMISSED as moot. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to seal Document 2, as it contains personal identification information. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5.2(a).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer