Miller ex rel. Miller v. Department of Human Services, 1:16-CV-101. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20181113g22
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2018, upon consideration of the proposed order (Doc. 66) and certificate of concurrence (Doc. 67) filed on today's date, wherein the parties together request that, in accordance with the settlement agreement entered by and between the parties, the court dismiss the claims raised by plaintiffs in the above-captioned action but retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the agreement or to entertain an
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2018, upon consideration of the proposed order (Doc. 66) and certificate of concurrence (Doc. 67) filed on today's date, wherein the parties together request that, in accordance with the settlement agreement entered by and between the parties, the court dismiss the claims raised by plaintiffs in the above-captioned action but retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the agreement or to entertain any..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2018, upon consideration of the proposed order (Doc. 66) and certificate of concurrence (Doc. 67) filed on today's date, wherein the parties together request that, in accordance with the settlement agreement entered by and between the parties, the court dismiss the claims raised by plaintiffs in the above-captioned action but retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the agreement or to entertain any motion for specific performance, and the court construing the parties' filings as a motion for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), see FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The proposed order (Doc. 66) and certificate of concurrence (Doc. 67) are CONSTRUED as a motion for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The motion is GRANTED as so construed.
2. Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED, but the court will retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the parties' settlement agreement through July 31, 2020, or the date of the final resolution of any motion for specific performance filed by July 31, 2020, whichever is later.
3. Defendants' motion (Doc. 11) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) is DISMISSED as moot.
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
