Filed: Dec. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . 1. On April 10, 2018, Defendants Daniel J. Barrett, Brian Gallagher, Albert C. Ondrey, and Richard Wilson moved to dismiss Plaintiff Joseph Robert Markle's Amended Complaint. 2. On May 7, 2018, Defendant Michael R. Adams also moved to dismiss that complaint. 3. On October 29, 2018, Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab recommended that this Court grant the motion filed by Mr. Barrett, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Ondrey, and Mr. Wilson, but deny the motio
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . 1. On April 10, 2018, Defendants Daniel J. Barrett, Brian Gallagher, Albert C. Ondrey, and Richard Wilson moved to dismiss Plaintiff Joseph Robert Markle's Amended Complaint. 2. On May 7, 2018, Defendant Michael R. Adams also moved to dismiss that complaint. 3. On October 29, 2018, Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab recommended that this Court grant the motion filed by Mr. Barrett, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Ondrey, and Mr. Wilson, but deny the motion..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
1. On April 10, 2018, Defendants Daniel J. Barrett, Brian Gallagher, Albert C. Ondrey, and Richard Wilson moved to dismiss Plaintiff Joseph Robert Markle's Amended Complaint.
2. On May 7, 2018, Defendant Michael R. Adams also moved to dismiss that complaint.
3. On October 29, 2018, Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab recommended that this Court grant the motion filed by Mr. Barrett, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Ondrey, and Mr. Wilson, but deny the motion filed by Mr. Adams.
4. Objections to these Reports and Recommendations were due by November 13, 2018, but none were filed.
5. This Court has reviewed these Reports and Recommendation and has found "no clear error on the face of the record."1
6. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
a. Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab's Reports and Recommendations, ECF Nos. 38 and 39, are ADOPTED IN THEIR ENTIRETY.
b. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Daniel J. Barrett, Brian Gallagher, Albert C. Ondrey, and Richard Wilson, is GRANTED, and all claims against those defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
c. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Michael R. Adams is DENIED.
7. This matter is remanded to Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab for further proceedings.
FootNotes
1. Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010).
