McNeil v. Global Tel-Link, 3:15-CV-01243. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190117k01
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . On November 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., recommended dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. 1 Plaintiff filed objections to this Report and Recommendation on December 4, 2018. 2 This Court has reviewed the entirety of Magistrate Judge Saporito's Report and Recommendation de novo 3 and agrees with its analysis and conclusions. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . On November 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., recommended dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. 1 Plaintiff filed objections to this Report and Recommendation on December 4, 2018. 2 This Court has reviewed the entirety of Magistrate Judge Saporito's Report and Recommendation de novo 3 and agrees with its analysis and conclusions. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge ..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
On November 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., recommended dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.1 Plaintiff filed objections to this Report and Recommendation on December 4, 2018.2
This Court has reviewed the entirety of Magistrate Judge Saporito's Report and Recommendation de novo3 and agrees with its analysis and conclusions. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Saporito, ECF No. 76, is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
2. Plaintiff's request for class certification is DENIED.
3. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, ECF Nos. 54, 55, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).4
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 76.
2. ECF No. 78.
3. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
4. See Byrd v. Shannon, 715 F.3d 117, 122 (3rd Cir. 2013).
Source: Leagle
