Peraza v. U.S., 3:13-CV-1316 (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190205e69
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARTIN C. CARLSON , Magistrate Judge . These three lawsuits were referred to the undersigned on January 18, 2019. Examination of the dockets reveal that there has been no substantive action in any of these lawsuits since February 2017. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file status reports in these three cases on or before February 22, 2019 which: 1. Provide the current status of these lawsuits; 2. Provide a proposed schedule for the expedited resol
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARTIN C. CARLSON , Magistrate Judge . These three lawsuits were referred to the undersigned on January 18, 2019. Examination of the dockets reveal that there has been no substantive action in any of these lawsuits since February 2017. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file status reports in these three cases on or before February 22, 2019 which: 1. Provide the current status of these lawsuits; 2. Provide a proposed schedule for the expedited resolu..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTIN C. CARLSON, Magistrate Judge.
These three lawsuits were referred to the undersigned on January 18, 2019. Examination of the dockets reveal that there has been no substantive action in any of these lawsuits since February 2017. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file status reports in these three cases on or before February 22, 2019 which:
1. Provide the current status of these lawsuits;
2. Provide a proposed schedule for the expedited resolution of this litigation; and
3. Explain why these cases either should, or should not, be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
The plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, is placed on notice that a failure to comply with this direction may result in the dismissal of this case pursuant to Ruel 41 for failure to prosecute.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
