Hause v. Berryhill, 18-cv-00941. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190301974
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, this 25 th day of February, 2019, for the reasons cited in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ordered and decreed as follows: 1. The Acting Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is hereby denied; 2. The Acting Commissioner is directed to file an answer to Plaintiffs complaint along with the transcript of the entire record of proceedings in this case within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; and 3. The parties are f
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, this 25 th day of February, 2019, for the reasons cited in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ordered and decreed as follows: 1. The Acting Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is hereby denied; 2. The Acting Commissioner is directed to file an answer to Plaintiffs complaint along with the transcript of the entire record of proceedings in this case within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; and 3. The parties are fu..
More
ORDER
ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2019, for the reasons cited in the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ordered and decreed as follows:
1. The Acting Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is hereby denied;
2. The Acting Commissioner is directed to file an answer to Plaintiffs complaint along with the transcript of the entire record of proceedings in this case within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; and
3. The parties are further directed to comply with the briefing schedule set forth in §§ 4, 5, and 6 of the Standing Practice Order (Doc. 5) in this case.
Source: Leagle