Walker v. Mooney, 4:17-CV-02342. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190315g23
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . On February 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss. No timely objections were filed to this Report and Recommendation. Where no objection is made to a report and recommendation, this Court will review the recommendation only for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874 , 878 (3d Cir
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . On February 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss. No timely objections were filed to this Report and Recommendation. Where no objection is made to a report and recommendation, this Court will review the recommendation only for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874 , 878 (3d Cir...
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
On February 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss. No timely objections were filed to this Report and Recommendation.
Where no objection is made to a report and recommendation, this Court will review the recommendation only for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987) (explaining that court should in some manner review recommendations regardless of whether objections were filed). Regardless of whether timely objections are made, district courts may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.31. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and has found no clear error on the face of the record. Consequently, it is hereby ordered that:
1. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED;
3. The complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Source: Leagle
