Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mendoza-Ordonez v. Lowe, 1:16-CV-1777. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190410992 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 28th DAY OF MARCH 2019, upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 44), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. 44) is NOT ADOPTED. 2. The objections raised in Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45) are SUSTAINED to the extent set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion. 3. Petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to the Eq
More

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 28th DAY OF MARCH 2019, upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 44), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. 44) is NOT ADOPTED. 2. The objections raised in Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45) are SUSTAINED to the extent set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion. 3. Petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 35) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART: a. The Motion is GRANTED in that Petitioner is awarded EAJA fees and costs as of November 2, 2016; b. The Motion is DENIED as to the period of August 21, 2016, through November 1, 2016. 4. $19,596.49 in fees and costs are awarded to Brophy and Lenahan P.C. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer