Baker v. Pennsylvania, 3:16-cv-1612. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190507576
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW, to wit, this 30 th day of April 2019, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealabilty. See 28 U.S.
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW, to wit, this 30 th day of April 2019, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealabilty. See 28 U.S.C..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, to wit, this 30th day of April 2019, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealabilty. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
Source: Leagle
