Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hill v. Lappin, 3:11-CV-01609. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190626e29 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Hill's motions in limine (Doc. 161, 171) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART ; 2. Evidence related to Hill's prior criminal convictions and the facts underlying them, as well as Hill's places of incarceration, length of current sentence, or restrictions during confinement shall be excluded from trial. Furthermore, Remaining Defendants are conditionally b
More

ORDER

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Hill's motions in limine (Doc. 161, 171) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2. Evidence related to Hill's prior criminal convictions and the facts underlying them, as well as Hill's places of incarceration, length of current sentence, or restrictions during confinement shall be excluded from trial. Furthermore, Remaining Defendants are conditionally barred from introducing evidence of Hill's disciplinary history. 3. Remaining Defendants are permitted to introduce evidence that Hill was confined to the SMU during the relevant period and evidence related to Hill's conduct between June 22, 2010, and June 24, 2010, but only to the extent that Remaining Defendants knew of, and relied upon, that information in determining whether to place and maintain Hill in four-point restraints.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer