Capozzi v. Catering By Marlins, Inc., 3:17-cv-2413. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190726e77
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation of the magistrate judge in which she recommends that the court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second case of action for failure to state a claim and remand the matter to her for further proceedings. Objections to the report and recommendation were due on July 12, 2019, and to date no objections have been filed. In considering whether to adopt a report and recommendation when no object
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation of the magistrate judge in which she recommends that the court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second case of action for failure to state a claim and remand the matter to her for further proceedings. Objections to the report and recommendation were due on July 12, 2019, and to date no objections have been filed. In considering whether to adopt a report and recommendation when no objecti..
More
ORDER
SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court is a report and recommendation of the magistrate judge in which she recommends that the court grant Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second case of action for failure to state a claim and remand the matter to her for further proceedings. Objections to the report and recommendation were due on July 12, 2019, and to date no objections have been filed.
In considering whether to adopt a report and recommendation when no objections have been filed, the court should, as a matter of good practice, "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error). Following an independent review of the record, the court is satisfied that the report and recommendation contains no clear error and will therefore adopt the recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED.
2) The motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
3) This matter is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
