Walsh v. Saul, 3:18cv673. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190820873
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , to wit, this 14th day of August 2019, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The defendant's objections (Doc. 28) are OVERRULED ; 2) Magistrate Judge Saporito's report and recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED ; 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to remand the case to the commissioner for a hearing before a different, constitutionally appointed, Administrative Law Judge; 4) The Clerk of Court is further directed to enter judgment in favo
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , to wit, this 14th day of August 2019, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The defendant's objections (Doc. 28) are OVERRULED ; 2) Magistrate Judge Saporito's report and recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED ; 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to remand the case to the commissioner for a hearing before a different, constitutionally appointed, Administrative Law Judge; 4) The Clerk of Court is further directed to enter judgment in favor..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, to wit, this 14th day of August 2019, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1) The defendant's objections (Doc. 28) are OVERRULED;
2) Magistrate Judge Saporito's report and recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED;
3) The Clerk of Court is directed to remand the case to the commissioner for a hearing before a different, constitutionally appointed, Administrative Law Judge;
4) The Clerk of Court is further directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and to close this case.
Source: Leagle
