Patel v. Dhaduk, 3:17-CV-02243. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190906b18
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO , District Judge . NOW, this 5 th day of September, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. (2) Defendant's Counterclaims I, II, III, and IV are DISMISSED with prejudice. (3) Defendant's Counterclaim V for tortious interference is DISMISSED without prejudice to Defendant filing an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of t
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO , District Judge . NOW, this 5 th day of September, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. (2) Defendant's Counterclaims I, II, III, and IV are DISMISSED with prejudice. (3) Defendant's Counterclaim V for tortious interference is DISMISSED without prejudice to Defendant filing an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of th..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW, this 5th day of September, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) The Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims (Doc. 29) is GRANTED.
(2) Defendant's Counterclaims I, II, III, and IV are DISMISSED with prejudice.
(3) Defendant's Counterclaim V for tortious interference is DISMISSED without prejudice to Defendant filing an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order to plead a plausible tortious interference claim.
(4) Failure to timely file an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims will result in the dismissal of the tortious interference claim with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
