Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Finarelli v. Monsanto Company, 3:19-CV-178. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190924685 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.'s Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Petition for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 6) and all relevant documents, for the reasons set out in the simultaneously filed Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' Osborn & Barr Communic
More

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.'s Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Petition for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 6) and all relevant documents, for the reasons set out in the simultaneously filed Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.'s Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Petition for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 6) are GRANTED; 2. Defendants Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc., and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc., are DISMISSED as Defendants in this action for lack of personal jurisdiction; 3. All claims against Defendants Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc., and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc., contained in the Complaint (Doc. 2 at 6-37) are DISMISSED.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer