Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dacenzo v. Mooney, 3:18-CV-0892. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20191018c91 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17th day of OCTOBER 2019, upon consideration of Mr. Dacenzo's petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and the parties' briefs, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. Respondent's amended motion for extension of time to file a response to the petition (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED. 2. The Court will accept Respondent's Response (ECF No. 17) as timely filed.
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of OCTOBER 2019, upon consideration of Mr. Dacenzo's petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the parties' briefs, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. Respondent's amended motion for extension of time to file a response to the petition (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED. 2. The Court will accept Respondent's Response (ECF No. 17) as timely filed. 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED as time-barred. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 5. The Clerk of Courts shall CLOSE this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer