Noye v. Johnson & Johnson, 1:15-cv-2382. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200306g67
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER YVETTE KANE , District Judge . AND NOW, on this 5th day of March 2020, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, wherein the Court determined that Plaintiff T Jason Noye ("Plaintiff")'s claim against Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. ("J&J") falls within the scope of the Arbitration Agreement at issue in this case, IT IS ORDERED THAT : 1. Plaintiff and J&J are compelled to arbitrate the remaining claim between them pursuant to the Arbitration
Summary: ORDER YVETTE KANE , District Judge . AND NOW, on this 5th day of March 2020, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, wherein the Court determined that Plaintiff T Jason Noye ("Plaintiff")'s claim against Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. ("J&J") falls within the scope of the Arbitration Agreement at issue in this case, IT IS ORDERED THAT : 1. Plaintiff and J&J are compelled to arbitrate the remaining claim between them pursuant to the Arbitration A..
More
ORDER
YVETTE KANE, District Judge.
AND NOW, on this 5th day of March 2020, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, wherein the Court determined that Plaintiff T Jason Noye ("Plaintiff")'s claim against Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. ("J&J") falls within the scope of the Arbitration Agreement at issue in this case, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff and J&J are compelled to arbitrate the remaining claim between them pursuant to the Arbitration Agreement;
2. The stay previously entered by the Court with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kelly Services, Inc. (Doc. No. 84 at 1) is LIFTED;
3. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case.
Source: Leagle
