Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Strotman v. Correct Care Solutions, 1:19-CV-0746. (2020)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200306g69 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . AND NOW, on this 5th day of March, 2020, upon consideration of the Defendants' uncontested motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint, and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Secretary Wetzel's motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) the Amended Complaint is GRANTED. 2. Mr. Strotman's claims against the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3
More

ORDER

AND NOW, on this 5th day of March, 2020, upon consideration of the Defendants' uncontested motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint, and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Secretary Wetzel's motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) the Amended Complaint is GRANTED. 2. Mr. Strotman's claims against the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Mr. Strotman's Eighth Amendment medical claim against Secretary Wetzel is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. Mr. Strotman's professional negligence claim against Secretary Wetzel is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. Correct Care Solutions and Dr. Petz's partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. 6. Mr. Strotman's professional negligence claim against Dr. Petz and Correct Care Solutions is DISMISSED without prejudice. 7. This action proceeds on Mr. Strotman's Eighth Amendment medical claim against Correct Care Solutions and Dr. Petz. 8. The parties shall complete discovery in this matter by Monday, August 24, 2020. 9. The parties may file dispositive motions and supporting briefs by Thursday, September 24, 2020. 10. Further scheduling in this matter is deferred pending disposition of any dispositive motions. 11. The Court will strike from the record any motions or briefs filed after the expiration of the applicable deadline without prior leave of Court. 12. No extensions of the pre-trial schedule shall be granted absent good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). 13. Mr. Strotman is reminded of his obligation to inform the Court of his current address. If the Court is unable to communicate with him because he has failed to notify the Court of his address, he will be deemed to have abandoned the lawsuit. See Doc. 2, Standing Practice Order, sent to Mr. Strotman on May 3, 2019.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer