welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
  4. 2020
  5. Doe v. Career Technology Center of Lackawanna County, 3:20-0088. (2020)

Doe v. Career Technology Center of Lackawanna County, 3:20-0088. (2020)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200312e35 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . In light of the foregoing Memorandum issued in the above-captioned case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motions to dismiss of CTC, (Doc. 7), and SSD, (Doc. 9), filed in the above-captioned case with respect to C.D.'s complaint, (Doc. 2), are GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. 2. The motion to dismiss of SSD with respect to the Title IX claim in Count I of the complaint, is DENIED. Count I will PROCEED as against CTC and S
More

ORDER

In light of the foregoing Memorandum issued in the above-captioned case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motions to dismiss of CTC, (Doc. 7), and SSD, (Doc. 9), filed in the above-captioned case with respect to C.D.'s complaint, (Doc. 2), are GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. 2. The motion to dismiss of SSD with respect to the Title IX claim in Count I of the complaint, is DENIED. Count I will PROCEED as against CTC and SSD. 3. The motions to dismiss of CTC and SSD with respect to Count II of the complaint are GRANTED, and the Title IX claim in Count II is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The motions to dismiss of CTC and SSD with respect to Count III of the complaint are GRANTED, and the Title IX retaliation claim in Count III is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 5. The motion to dismiss of SSD with respect to Count IV, 14th Amendment due process claim, and Count VI, failure to train and supervise claim of the complaint, is DENIED. Counts IV and VI will PROCEED as against CTC and SSD. 6. The motions to dismiss of CTC and SSD with respect to Count V of the complaint, state-created danger claims, are GRANTED, and this claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 7. The motions to dismiss of CTC and SSD with respect to Counts VII and VIII of the complaint, state law tort claims, are GRANTED, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 8. The defendants CTC and SSD are directed to file their answers to the remaining claims against them in the plaintiff's complaint in on or before March 25, 2020.
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
3:20-0088.
Counsels
  • Michael J. Pisanchyn, Jr.
  • Thomas J. Carroll, Jr.
  • Richard A. Polachek
  • Austin J. Soldano
  • Karl A. Romberger, Jr.
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer