Moore v. Granlund, 3:12-CV-00223. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200319c84
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion in limine (Doc. 141) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Defendants are conditionally permitted to introduce evidence related to (1) Moore's use of multiple names and dates of birth, and (2) misconduct reports issued by Granlund to Moore. Defendants are conditionally barred from presented evidence related to (1) Moore's failure t
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion in limine (Doc. 141) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Defendants are conditionally permitted to introduce evidence related to (1) Moore's use of multiple names and dates of birth, and (2) misconduct reports issued by Granlund to Moore. Defendants are conditionally barred from presented evidence related to (1) Moore's failure to..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion in limine (Doc. 141) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
2. Defendants are conditionally permitted to introduce evidence related to (1) Moore's use of multiple names and dates of birth, and (2) misconduct reports issued by Granlund to Moore. Defendants are conditionally barred from presented evidence related to (1) Moore's failure to file income tax returns, and (2) Moore's prior criminal convictions; and
3. Moore is conditionally barred from presenting evidence of (1) prior grievances, discipline, or lawsuits against defense witnesses, (2) the conditions of confinement in the RHU, (3) Granlund's personal or sexual history, (4) an alleged settlement offer, (5) Moore's offer to take a polygraph examination, and (6) the adequacy of the prison's investigation of Moore's claims. The Court reserves until trial any ruling on whether Moore may admit evidence related to his grievances or other self-created documents related to the incidents alleged.
Source: Leagle
