Filed: Jun. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2013
Summary: OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J. This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas after Appellant Wali Rahman was convicted of aggravated assault, 1 simple assault, 2 recklessly endangering another person (REAP), 3 resisting arrest, 4 and disorderly conduct. 5 Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions and claims the trial Commonwealth v. Wilgus, 615 Pa. 32, 40 A.3d 1201 , 1205 (2012) (citing Commonwealth v. Johnson,
Summary: OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J. This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas after Appellant Wali Rahman was convicted of aggravated assault, 1 simple assault, 2 recklessly endangering another person (REAP), 3 resisting arrest, 4 and disorderly conduct. 5 Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions and claims the trial Commonwealth v. Wilgus, 615 Pa. 32, 40 A.3d 1201 , 1205 (2012) (citing Commonwealth v. Johnson, 6..
More
OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas after Appellant Wali Rahman was convicted of aggravated assault,1 simple assault,2 recklessly endangering another person (REAP),3 resisting arrest,4 and disorderly conduct.5 Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions and claims the trial Commonwealth v. Wilgus, 615 Pa. 32, 40 A.3d 1201, 1205 (2012) (citing Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (2009)). Accordingly, we find these issues to be waived for lack of development.
For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Appellant's judgment of sentence.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
