MICHAELS v. ALEXANDRA, 12-219E. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20130712b21
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER MAURICE B. COHILL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel Production of Unaltered Documents" [ECF #28]. At this stage in the proceedings, where the discovery period has not yet commenced, Defendants do not have any duty to turn over any documentation to Plaintiff. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion shall be denied as being premature. AND NOW, this 11 th day of July, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED t
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER MAURICE B. COHILL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel Production of Unaltered Documents" [ECF #28]. At this stage in the proceedings, where the discovery period has not yet commenced, Defendants do not have any duty to turn over any documentation to Plaintiff. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion shall be denied as being premature. AND NOW, this 11 th day of July, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED th..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MAURICE B. COHILL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel Production of Unaltered Documents" [ECF #28].
At this stage in the proceedings, where the discovery period has not yet commenced, Defendants do not have any duty to turn over any documentation to Plaintiff. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion shall be denied as being premature.
AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Unaltered Documents [ECF #28] is DENIED without prejudice as premature.
Source: Leagle
