Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

REESE v. LAMAS, 12-1592. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20130806b34 Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge. AND NOW, this 5 th day of August, 2013, after the petitioner, Randy Reese, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge
More

ORDER

TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2013, after the petitioner, Randy Reese, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner (ECF No. 4) is dismissed and, because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exists, a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer