CROCKETT v. MILLER, 3:11-cv-272-KRG-KAP. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140805a67
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2014
Summary: Memorandum Order KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge. Plaintiff's "Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment" at docket no. 115, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (3) and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 9, 2014, docket no. 117, recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1), that they had fourteen days to serve and file written objectio
Summary: Memorandum Order KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge. Plaintiff's "Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment" at docket no. 115, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (3) and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 9, 2014, docket no. 117, recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1), that they had fourteen days to serve and file written objection..
More
Memorandum Order
KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff's "Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment" at docket no. 115, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (3) and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 9, 2014, docket no. 117, recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (1), that they had fourteen days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed timely objections at docket no. 118 that are meritless.
Upon de novo review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 4th of August, 2014, it is
ORDERED that the motion at docket no. 115 is denied.
Source: Leagle
