KRAMER v. THE CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, 13-606. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141028q03
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Re: ECF No. 70 JOY FLOWERS CONTI, District Judge. On April 29, 2014, the above captioned case was filed in this Court and was referred to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges. On August 19, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy issued her Report and Recommendation in which she recommende
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Re: ECF No. 70 JOY FLOWERS CONTI, District Judge. On April 29, 2014, the above captioned case was filed in this Court and was referred to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges. On August 19, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy issued her Report and Recommendation in which she recommended..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Re: ECF No. 70
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, District Judge.
On April 29, 2014, the above captioned case was filed in this Court and was referred to a Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges.
On August 19, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy issued her Report and Recommendation in which she recommended denial of Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief at (ECF No. 65). The parties had until September 5, 2014 to file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.
After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation as the Opinion of the Court and accepts Magistrate Judge Eddy's recommendation.
Accordingly,
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2014, Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 65) is HEREBY DENIED.
Source: Leagle
