Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. LYNN, CR 09-279 (see CA 13-1693). (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20141231c32 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER ALAN N. BLOCH, District Judge. AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. No. 383), and affirmation and memorandum of law in support thereof (Doc. No. 383, Att.), filed in the above captioned matter on November 27, 2013, as well as the Government's response thereto (Doc. No. 391), filed on February 4, 2014, and Petitioner's reply (Doc. No. 397), filed on May 15, 2014, IT
More

ORDER

ALAN N. BLOCH, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 383), and affirmation and memorandum of law in support thereof (Doc. No. 383, Att.), filed in the above captioned matter on November 27, 2013, as well as the Government's response thereto (Doc. No. 391), filed on February 4, 2014, and Petitioner's reply (Doc. No. 397), filed on May 15, 2014,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed herewith, Petitioner's Motion is DENIED. Further, this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this case because, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer