Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STERRETT v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., 14-235. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150708e23 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Kelly's ruling regarding Plaintiff's tax returns was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (reciting standards of review governing magistrate judges' non-dispositive rulings). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objections ( Doc. 76 ) are OVERRULED , and Judge Kelly's ruling is AFFIRMED . Furthermore, Plaintiff's stated concerns regarding his wife's privacy interests easily may be addressed throu
More

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Magistrate Judge Kelly's ruling regarding Plaintiff's tax returns was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (reciting standards of review governing magistrate judges' non-dispositive rulings). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 76) are OVERRULED, and Judge Kelly's ruling is AFFIRMED.

Furthermore, Plaintiff's stated concerns regarding his wife's privacy interests easily may be addressed through redaction or protective order. See Kumar v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 2009 WL 3681837, *3 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2009) (redaction); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570, *3 n.2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2004) (protective order). The Court is confident that counsel can resolve this issue without further judicial intervention.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer