Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CORTLESSA v. FITZGERALD, 14-1347. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20151211b60
Filed: Dec. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER ECF Nos. 73, 76, 79, 81, 83 & 92. MARK R. HORNAK , District Judge . Plaintiff delivered his Complaint to the clerk of courts for the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on October 6, 2014. The original Complaint was filed on October 14, 2015, and referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rule
More

MEMORANDUM ORDER ECF Nos. 73, 76, 79, 81, 83 & 92.

Plaintiff delivered his Complaint to the clerk of courts for the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on October 6, 2014. The original Complaint was filed on October 14, 2015, and referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint was filed on March 2, 2015. (ECF No. 67.)

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 92) filed on October 30, 2015, recommended that the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants at ECF Nos. 73, 76, 79, 81, and 83 be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record and the pro se Plaintift: The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local Rule of Court 72.D.2, they had fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. On November 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed Objections (ECF No. 96), and on November 25, 2015, Defendant Stephen A. Zappala filed a Brief in Opposition to the Objections (ECF No. 103).

After review of the pleadings, documents in the case, and the Objections, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss at ECF Nos. 73, 76, 79, 81, 83 are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 92) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated October 30,2015, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer