Bogden v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 17-1514. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180906e60
Filed: Sep. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE CATHY BISSOON , District Judge . Consistent with the Order to Show Cause dated August 23, 2018 (Doc. 24), to which Plaintiff has not timely responded, this case will be dismissed pursuant to Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. , 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984). Specifically, dismissal is warranted under the Poulis factors regarding Plaintiff's personal responsibility; her failure to demonstrate excusable neglect; and the lack of effective, alternative sanctions. Id
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE CATHY BISSOON , District Judge . Consistent with the Order to Show Cause dated August 23, 2018 (Doc. 24), to which Plaintiff has not timely responded, this case will be dismissed pursuant to Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. , 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984). Specifically, dismissal is warranted under the Poulis factors regarding Plaintiff's personal responsibility; her failure to demonstrate excusable neglect; and the lack of effective, alternative sanctions. Id...
More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.
Consistent with the Order to Show Cause dated August 23, 2018 (Doc. 24), to which Plaintiff has not timely responded, this case will be dismissed pursuant to Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984). Specifically, dismissal is warranted under the Poulis factors regarding Plaintiff's personal responsibility; her failure to demonstrate excusable neglect; and the lack of effective, alternative sanctions. Id. at 868.
For these reasons, and consistent with the express terms of the August 23rd Order, the above-captioned case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
