Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: Memorandum Order KIM R. GIBSON , District Judge . This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Civil Rule 72. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on August 10, 2018, ECF no. 16, recommending that the defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF no. 7, be granted in part and denied in part. The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1), they had fourtee
Summary: Memorandum Order KIM R. GIBSON , District Judge . This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Civil Rule 72. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on August 10, 2018, ECF no. 16, recommending that the defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF no. 7, be granted in part and denied in part. The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1), they had fourteen..
More
Memorandum Order
KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge.
This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636 and Local Civil Rule 72.
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on August 10, 2018, ECF no. 16, recommending that the defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF no. 7, be granted in part and denied in part.
The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (1), they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.
After review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation under the "reasoned consideration" standard, see EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir.2017) (standard of review when no timely and specific objections are filed), the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2018, it is ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF no. 7, is granted in part and denied in part as recommended in the Report and Recommendation at ECF no. 16, which is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The matter remains with the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
