Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lawson v. Barger, 17-323 Erie. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190514c71 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 13, 2019
Latest Update: May 13, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER , District Judge . This prisoner civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on December 7, 2017 and was referred to the undersigned, then a United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial proceedings. On September 14, 2018, the undersigned was sworn in as a United States District Judge. This action was reassigned to the undersigned, as presiding judge, on September 18, 2018, and was subsequently referred to United States Magistrate Judge
More

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This prisoner civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on December 7, 2017 and was referred to the undersigned, then a United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial proceedings. On September 14, 2018, the undersigned was sworn in as a United States District Judge. This action was reassigned to the undersigned, as presiding judge, on September 18, 2018, and was subsequently referred to United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On April 11, 2019, Judge Lanzillo issued a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted, and that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied, based upon Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. [ECF No. 69]. On April 29, 2019, Plaintiff filed Objections to the R&R [ECF No. 70], in which he essentially reiterates, and expands upon, the same arguments raised in his previous documents filed with this Court, specifically that a required appeal of his grievance was in some way interfered with. Unopposed facts do not support this excuse, but rather support the Magistrate Judge's finding that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.

Therefore, after de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 13th day of May, 2019;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 43] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 48] is DENIED. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued April 11, 2019 [ECF No. 69], is adopted as the opinion of the court.

The Clerk is directed to mark this case closed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer