Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Falotico, 16-1068. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190603b03 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 31, 2019
Latest Update: May 31, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON , District Judge . This case has been referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72. On May 13, 2019, Chief Magistrate Judge Eddy issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 76) recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 75) be treated as a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Ci
More

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case has been referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On May 13, 2019, Chief Magistrate Judge Eddy issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 76) recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 75) be treated as a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation was sent to Plaintiff, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in this case, together with the Report and Recommendation, it hereby is ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 75) shall be construed as a stipulation of dismissal; this case shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and Chief Magistrate Judge Eddy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 76) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer