Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Geness v. Pennsylvania, 16-876. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200129f43 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28thday of January 2020, upon considering the Defendant Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts' Motion to compel discovery and for sanctions (ECF Doc. No. 307), and consistent with our Policies, it is ORDERED the Administrative Office's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 307) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: 1. Plaintiff shall fully respond, including fulsome supplemental responses and description of objections to interrogatory Nos.
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28thday of January 2020, upon considering the Defendant Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts' Motion to compel discovery and for sanctions (ECF Doc. No. 307), and consistent with our Policies, it is ORDERED the Administrative Office's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 307) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:

1. Plaintiff shall fully respond, including fulsome supplemental responses and description of objections to interrogatory Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 12 and document request Nos. 1, 2, and 3, along with a detailed privilege log no later than February 3, 2020 or risk the awarding of monetary sanctions upon motion against Plaintiffs counsel, including payment of, reasonable fees incurred by the Administrative Office in having to repeatedly seek the same discovery; and,

2. The Administrative Office's request for sanctions is DENIED without prejudice to be renewed if necessary under this Order providing further specific notice to the Plaintiff of his obligations.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer