Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bombar v. Wetzel, 17-1035. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200226e03 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 25, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF COURT NORA BARRY FISCHER , Senior District Judge . AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2020, after a Report and Recommendation was filed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on February 3, 2020, (Docket No. [72]), recommending that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Patrick Braunlich, Robert D. Gilmore, and John E. Wetzel (Docket No. [66]) be granted with respect to Defendants Gilmore and Wetzel and denied with respect to Defendant Braunlich, the plaintiff was provided 14
More

ORDER OF COURT

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2020, after a Report and Recommendation was filed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on February 3, 2020, (Docket No. [72]), recommending that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Patrick Braunlich, Robert D. Gilmore, and John E. Wetzel (Docket No. [66]) be granted with respect to Defendants Gilmore and Wetzel and denied with respect to Defendant Braunlich, the plaintiff was provided 14 days to file written objections thereto, making objections from Plaintiff, as an unregistered ECF party, due by February 20, 2020, and no objections having been lodged by said date, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Lenihan's Report and Recommendation, (Docket No. [72]), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [66] is GRANTED, IN PART, and DENIED, IN PART. Said Motion [66] is granted with respect to Defendants Gilmore and Wetzel and denied with respect to Defendant Braunlich. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Gilmore and Wetzel are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer