U.S. v. SANTANA-REYES, 13-0534CCC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Number: infdco20140924j08
Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on August 27, 2014 ( docket entry 1725 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [25] Luis M. Santana-Reyes before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Silvia Carre o-Coll on August 19, 2014, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on August 27, 2014 ( docket entry 1725 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [25] Luis M. Santana-Reyes before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Silvia Carre o-Coll on August 19, 2014, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the ..
More
ORDER
CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on August 27, 2014 (docket entry 1725) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [25] Luis M. Santana-Reyes before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Silvia Carreño-Coll on August 19, 2014, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the consequences of pleading guilty and contains all elements of the offense charged in the indictment.
This case was referred to the U.S. Probation Office for preparation of a Presentence Investigation Report since August 19, 2014. The sentencing hearing is set for November 18, 2014 at 4:15 PM.
The U.S. Probation Officer is reminded that, should any objections be raised by defendant to the PreSentence Report, the Addendum to said PreSentence Report must specifically identify any unresolved objections, the grounds for the objections, and the U.S. Probation Officer's comments on them, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(g). The party that raised the unresolved objections shall, within twenty-four (24) hours after the Addendum is disclosed, state in writing whether it will insist that the unresolved objections be ruled upon by the Court. Failure to do so will be deemed by the Court as a withdrawal of the unresolved objections.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
