U.S. v. SANTIAGO-DE JESUS, 12-0192-33CCC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Number: infdco20150715b91
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO , District Judge . Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on June 17, 2015 ( D.E. 1862 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [33] Elizabeth Santiago-de Jes s before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Camille L. V lez-Riv on June 17, 2015, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that her plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of her rights and th
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO , District Judge . Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on June 17, 2015 ( D.E. 1862 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [33] Elizabeth Santiago-de Jes s before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Camille L. V lez-Riv on June 17, 2015, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that her plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of her rights and the..
More
ORDER
CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on June 17, 2015 (D.E. 1862) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [33] Elizabeth Santiago-de Jesús before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Camille L. Vélez-Rivé on June 17, 2015, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that her plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of her rights and the consequences of pleading guilty and contains all elements of the offense charged in the indictment.
This case was referred to the U.S. Probation Office for preparation of a Presentence Investigation Report since June 17, 2015. The sentencing hearing is set for September 17, 2015 at 4:30 PM.
The U.S. Probation Officer is reminded that, should any objections be raised by defendant to the PreSentence Report, the Addendum to said PreSentence Report must specifically identify any unresolved objections, the grounds for the objections, and the U.S. Probation Officer's comments on them, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(g). The party that raised the unresolved objections shall, within twenty-four (24) hours after the Addendum is disclosed, state in writing whether it will insist that the unresolved objections be ruled upon by the Court. Failure to do so will be deemed by the Court as a withdrawal of the unresolved objections.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
