U.S. v. TORRES-GOMEZ, 15-0213-05CCC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Number: infdco20160105a67
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO , District Judge . Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on November 4, 2015 ( D.E. 170 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [5] Hern n Torres-G mez before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Marcos E. L pez on September 28, 2015, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the conseq
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO , District Judge . Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on November 4, 2015 ( D.E. 170 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [5] Hern n Torres-G mez before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Marcos E. L pez on September 28, 2015, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the consequ..
More
ORDER
CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on November 4, 2015 (D.E. 170) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [5] Hernán Torres-Gómez before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Marcos E. López on September 28, 2015, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the consequences of pleading guilty and contains all elements of the offense charged in the indictment.
This case was referred to the U.S. Probation Office for preparation of a Presentence Investigation Report since September 28, 2015. The sentencing hearing will be set by separate order.
The U.S. Probation Officer is reminded that, should any objections be raised by defendant to the PreSentence Report, the Addendum to said PreSentence Report must specifically identify any unresolved objections, the grounds for the objections, and the U.S. Probation Officer's comments on them, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(g). The party that raised the unresolved objections shall, within twenty-four (24) hours after the Addendum is disclosed, state in writing whether it will insist that the unresolved objections be ruled upon by the Court. Failure to do so will be deemed by the Court as a withdrawal of the unresolved objections.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
