Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Cruz, 14-0562-27CCC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Puerto Rico Number: infdco20180918722 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO , District Judge . Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on August 13, 2018 ( d.e. 1027 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [27] Juan Molina Cruz before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Bruce J. McGiverin on August 7, 2018, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the consequen
More

ORDER

Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on August 13, 2018 (d.e. 1027) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant [27] Juan Molina Cruz before U.S. Magistrate-Judge Bruce J. McGiverin on August 7, 2018, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the consequences of pleading guilty and contains all elements of the offense charged in the indictment. Defendant is advised, however, that the Court will defer its decision on whether to accept or reject the parties' Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement until it has reviewed the Pre-Sentence Report.

This case was referred to the U.S. Probation Office for preparation of a Presentence Investigation Report since August 6, 2018. The sentencing hearing is set for NOVEMBER 6, 2018 at 1:15 PM.

The U.S. Probation Officer is reminded that, should any objections be raised by defendant to the PreSentence Report, the Addendum to said PreSentence Report must specifically identify any unresolved objections, the grounds for the objections, and the U.S. Probation Officer's comments on them, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(g). The party that raised the unresolved objections shall, within twenty-four (24) hours after the Addendum is disclosed, state in writing whether it will insist that the unresolved objections be ruled upon by the Court. Failure to do so will be deemed by the Court as a withdrawal of the unresolved objections.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer