U.S. v. ISLER, CR 03-71-02-ML. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Rhode Island
Number: infdco20130729a40
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARY M. LISI, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is a motion (Doc. #283) filed by Defendant Charles Isler pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), 3621(b), and 3624(c) ("Mixed Motion"). The Mixed Motion is DENIED essentially for the reasons put forth in the government's objection (Doc. #285) to the Mixed Motion. The Court notes that even if it did have the authority to make a recommendation to the BOP as to Isler's placement, that decision is more appropriately left to the BOP. SO ORDE
Summary: ORDER MARY M. LISI, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is a motion (Doc. #283) filed by Defendant Charles Isler pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), 3621(b), and 3624(c) ("Mixed Motion"). The Mixed Motion is DENIED essentially for the reasons put forth in the government's objection (Doc. #285) to the Mixed Motion. The Court notes that even if it did have the authority to make a recommendation to the BOP as to Isler's placement, that decision is more appropriately left to the BOP. SO ORDER..
More
ORDER
MARY M. LISI, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion (Doc. #283) filed by Defendant Charles Isler pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(c)(2), 3621(b), and 3624(c) ("Mixed Motion"). The Mixed Motion is DENIED essentially for the reasons put forth in the government's objection (Doc. #285) to the Mixed Motion.
The Court notes that even if it did have the authority to make a recommendation to the BOP as to Isler's placement, that decision is more appropriately left to the BOP.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
