ROGERS v. STATE, 2013-MO-026. (2013)
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Number: inscco20130925710
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2013
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. PER CURIAM. We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of Respondent's application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
PER CURIAM.
We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of Respondent's application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
