Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DAVIDSON v. CITY OF BEAUFORT, 2014-MO-010. (2014)

Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina Number: inscco20140416641
Filed: Apr. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2014
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. PER CURIAM. After careful review of the Appendixes, Briefs, and Record, the writ of certiorari is DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. PLEICONES, Acting Chief Justice, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the Appendixes, Briefs, and Record, the writ of certiorari is

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

PLEICONES, Acting Chief Justice, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer