HELEN E. BURRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
On May 31, 2012, Simpson's mother, Elizabeth W. Simpson ("Mother"), executed a note and mortgage in favor of Founders. The principal amount of the note is $47,000.00, with yearly interest of 3.25%. The note requires monthly payments of $330.25 beginning on July 4, 2012. The mortgage was recorded on June 11, 2012 with the York County Clerk of Court and is secured by property located at 552 East Robertson Road, Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29730 (the "Property"). The note amortizes the debt through fixed installment payments that extend to 2027 and the mortgage includes a "due on sale" clause.
Simpson and Mother resided together at the Property until she passed away on July 13, 2016. Mother left the Property to Simpson in her will. At the time of Mother's death, the payments on the note were current and Simpson continued to ensure payments were made to Founders thereafter. Founders sent three letters to Simpson notifying him that he must complete the loan application process in order to transfer Mother's loan to his name and if not timely completed, Founders would stop accepting payments. A deed of distribution was recorded on July 25, 2017, conveying the Property to Simpson, but he failed to assume any of the loan obligations. In September 2017, Founders refused to accept further payments from Simpson, accelerated the note, and initiated a foreclosure action in state court. Founders' representative testified that the acceleration was not due to Mother's death, but rather due to the transfer of the Property to Simpson through her estate.
Simpson filed a petition for Chapter 13 relief on October 20, 2017. There is no dispute that the Property is an asset of his bankruptcy estate and Simpson continues to live there. Simpson's plan provides for curing the default of pre-petition payments and maintaining post-petition note payments to Founders pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5). The applicable plan provisions are:
(emphasis in original).
Founders asserts it is owed $33,932.63, as of October 27, 2017, which includes principal, accrued interest, and late fees, plus approximately $2,350.28 in attorney's fees and costs.
Currently, Simpson's only income is contributions from family members while he is waiting for a response on his disability claim. At the hearing, Founders voiced concerns over the feasibility of the plan as a result of Simpson's lack of regular income. However, that issue was not raised in Founders' filed Objection. At the hearing, the Chapter 13 Trustee did not raise any concerns regarding the feasibility of Simpson's plan and, although she could not recommend confirmation until after the claims bar date, she did not foresee any issues with Simpson's confirmation.
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157. This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (L) and this Court may enter a final order.
Pursuant to § 1322(b)(2), a Chapter 13 plan may modify the rights of creditors who hold a claim against the estate. A Chapter 13 plan may "provide for the curing or waiving of any default," and "provide for the curing of any default within a reasonable time and maintenance of payments while the case is pending on any unsecured claim or secured claim on which the last payment is due after the date on which the final payment under the plan is due[.]" 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(3) & (5). Section § 1322(c) provides:
Simpson owns the Property; therefore, it is an asset of the bankruptcy estate. The Property is Simpson's principal residence; Founders has a lien on the Property; no foreclosure sale has been conducted; and the last payment on the original payment schedule for Founder's claim is not due before the date on which the final payment under the plan is due. On these facts, the Code allows Simpson to cure the default of pre-petition payments and maintain the original post-petition payment schedule for the note while this case is pending. In re Trapp, 260 B.R. 267, 271-72 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2001). Founders asserts Trapp is distinguishable because this debt was accelerated as a result of a due on sale clause, but failed to present any authority to support its argument that Simpson cannot cure and maintain through the plan under § 1322(b)(5) merely because it elected to accelerate the note pre-petition pursuant to this clause .
Founders also expresses concern over the status of its interest in the Property and repayment of any remaining amounts after completion of the plan. However, a close examination of the plan language reveals that status: consistent with § 1325(a)(5), Simpson's plan provides that "[h]olders of secured claims shall retain liens to the extent provided by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)(i)."
11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)(i)(aa).
The plan simply allows Simpson to cure and maintain payments during the plan — it does not propose alteration of Founders' right to payment of the underlying debt thereafter as determined under nonbankruptcy law and specifically provides that Founders retains its lien to secure payment. Simpson has, therefore, shown that Founders' plan treatment complies with the requirements of the Code and Founders' Objection must be overruled.
Although the issues raised in Founders' Objection regarding its plan treatment are determined by this Order, the Chapter 13 Trustee reported that she cannot yet recommend confirmation and the confirmation hearing has been continued. Should the Chapter 13 Trustee have concerns about plan feasibility, she may raise those concerns at the appropriate time.