FENOLLOL GROUP, INC. v. BANISTER, 2010-UP-535. (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Number: inscco20101215685
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 14, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2010
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. PER CURIAM: Appellants appeals from the trial court's grant of a temporary injunction. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C. , 372 S.C. 295 ,301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903 , 907 (2007) (issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court will not be consider
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. PER CURIAM: Appellants appeals from the trial court's grant of a temporary injunction. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C. , 372 S.C. 295 ,301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903 , 907 (2007) (issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court will not be considere..
More
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeals from the trial court's grant of a temporary injunction. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C., 372 S.C. 295,301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903, 907 (2007) (issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court will not be considered on appeal).
AFFIRMED.1
THOMAS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
FootNotes
1. We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Source: Leagle
