Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

REA v. GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 2013-UP-424. (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina Number: inscco20131120773 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2013
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC. PER CURIAM. Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Staubes v. City of Folly Beach, 339 S.C. 406 , 412, 529 S.E.2d 543 , 546 (2000) ("It is well-settled that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate rev
More

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Staubes v. City of Folly Beach, 339 S.C. 406, 412, 529 S.E.2d 543, 546 (2000) ("It is well-settled that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review."); id. ("Without an initial ruling by the trial court, a reviewing court simply [cannot] evaluate whether the trial court committed error.").

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

FootNotes


1. We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer