STATE v. BLOODSAW, 2015-UP-002. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Number: inscco20150107395
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2015
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC. PER CURIAM. Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. FootNotes 1. We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
FootNotes
1. We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Source: Leagle
