Filed: Dec. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2015
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(D)(2), SCARC. PER CURIAM . After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, we now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 1 DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 2 HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur. FootNotes 1. See Ellison v. State, 382 S.C. 189 , 191, 676 S.E.2d 671 , 672 (2009) (wherein our supreme court extended its
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(D)(2), SCARC. PER CURIAM . After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, we now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 1 DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 2 HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur. FootNotes 1. See Ellison v. State, 382 S.C. 189 , 191, 676 S.E.2d 671 , 672 (2009) (wherein our supreme court extended its ..
More
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(D)(2), SCARC.
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, we now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.1
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.2
HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
