Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. NELSON, 2016-UP-270. (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina Number: inscco20160603902 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2016
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC. PER CURIAM . TyShema Nelson appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2015). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465 , 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), w
More

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC.

TyShema Nelson appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2015). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Nelson's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, LOCKEMY, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

FootNotes


1. We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer