Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. NEWCOMB, 2018-UP-360. (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina Number: inscco20180822592 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC. PER CURIAM . Kenneth Young appeals from the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465 , 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987)
More

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC.

Kenneth Young appeals from the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Young's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

FootNotes


1. We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer