Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ATTORNEYS LIABILITY PROTECTION SOCIETY, INC. v. LOWE, 2:10-02267. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20120106b07 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on plaintiff's and defendants' cross motions for summary judgment. On the issue of coverage, the burden of proof is on the insured to show that a claim falls within the coverage of an insurance contract, Gamble v. Travelers Ins. Co. , 160 S.E.2d 523 , 525 (S.C. 1968), while the insurer bears the burden of establishing exclusions to coverage, Boggs v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. , 252 S.E.2d 565 , 568 (1979). Having thoroughly
More

ORDER

DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on plaintiff's and defendants' cross motions for summary judgment. On the issue of coverage, the burden of proof is on the insured to show that a claim falls within the coverage of an insurance contract, Gamble v. Travelers Ins. Co., 160 S.E.2d 523, 525 (S.C. 1968), while the insurer bears the burden of establishing exclusions to coverage, Boggs v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 252 S.E.2d 565, 568 (1979). Having thoroughly considered the parties' written and oral submissions, the court holds that genuine issues of material fact exist, including but not limited to, the significance of the jury's verdict amount. Therefore, the court DENIES all motions for summary judgment.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer