Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER TERRY L. WOOTEN, District Judge. The plaintiff, Albert S. Kelly ("plaintiff"), proceeding pro se , filed this civil action on September 15, 2011. (Doc. # 1). The plaintiff, on March 23, 2012, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in this case. (Doc. # 67). In the motion, he states it does not matter to him whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. (Doc. # 67). On March 27, 2012, the defendants filed a response in support of the plaintiff's motion in which they request that a
Summary: ORDER TERRY L. WOOTEN, District Judge. The plaintiff, Albert S. Kelly ("plaintiff"), proceeding pro se , filed this civil action on September 15, 2011. (Doc. # 1). The plaintiff, on March 23, 2012, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in this case. (Doc. # 67). In the motion, he states it does not matter to him whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. (Doc. # 67). On March 27, 2012, the defendants filed a response in support of the plaintiff's motion in which they request that an..
More
ORDER
TERRY L. WOOTEN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Albert S. Kelly ("plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on September 15, 2011. (Doc. # 1). The plaintiff, on March 23, 2012, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in this case. (Doc. # 67). In the motion, he states it does not matter to him whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. (Doc. # 67). On March 27, 2012, the defendants filed a response in support of the plaintiff's motion in which they request that any dismissal be with prejudice. (Doc. # 68). In light of the foregoing, the plaintiff's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 67) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
