CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON v. COOPER, 3:10-cv-1382-JFA. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20120501a64
Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge. This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Hoover. (ECF No. 73). Defendant Hoover has failed to file a responsive pleading or to enter any appearance at all in this case; as such, the Clerk made an entry of default against Defendant Hoover on August 17, 2010. Plaintiff has now asked this court to enter a default judgment against Defendant Hoover for the rescission and declaratory judgment claims a
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge. This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Hoover. (ECF No. 73). Defendant Hoover has failed to file a responsive pleading or to enter any appearance at all in this case; as such, the Clerk made an entry of default against Defendant Hoover on August 17, 2010. Plaintiff has now asked this court to enter a default judgment against Defendant Hoover for the rescission and declaratory judgment claims as..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Hoover. (ECF No. 73). Defendant Hoover has failed to file a responsive pleading or to enter any appearance at all in this case; as such, the Clerk made an entry of default against Defendant Hoover on August 17, 2010. Plaintiff has now asked this court to enter a default judgment against Defendant Hoover for the rescission and declaratory judgment claims asserted in Plaintiff's Complaint.
Based on the equitable nature of the remedies sought by the plaintiff in this case, the court is not required to enter a money judgment against Defendant Hoover. Therefore, a damages hearing is unnecessary in this case. This court hereby grants Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Hoover and finds for the plaintiff as to the rescission and declaratory judgment claims asserted in its complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
